Effectiveness and Side Effects of Natural and Modern Contraceptive Methods Review
Main Article Content
Shalvira Purnama
Saufa Ayudia Pratiwi
Family planning enables couples to regulate childbirth and improve reproductive health. This systematic literature review compares the effectiveness and side effects of natural and modern contraceptive methods among multiparous families in Indonesia. The review followed the PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were conducted using Google Scholar with the keywords "natural contraception," "modern contraception," "multiparity," "effectiveness," and "side effects". Nineteen articles published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed. Findings indicate that modern contraceptive methods such as intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, injections, pills, and surgical procedures have higher effectiveness rates (98–99%) compared to natural methods including the calendar, cervical mucus, and withdrawal techniques (70–95%). However, modern methods are often associated with minor side effects, such as menstrual irregularities, weight changes, and mood fluctuations, while serious complications are rare. Natural methods are generally free from physical side effects but carry a higher failure rate if not practiced consistently. Social, cultural, and economic factors strongly influence contraceptive choice among multiparous families. Although modern contraception is more effective, stigma, misinformation, and limited accessibility continue to hinder optimal utilization. Further large-scale analytical studies are required to assess long-term safety and to identify contextual factors that influence contraceptive decision-making in Indonesia.
Matahari R, Utami FP, Sugiharti S. Buku Ajar Keluarga Berencana Dan Kontrasepsi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Ilmu; 2018.
Hadija S, Kasmiati K, Sardi S. Efektivitas Metode Kontrasepsi Alami Terhadap Pengaturan Jarak Kehamilan. J Kesehat Ibu Anak. 2022.
Lubis R. Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhi Pemilihan Metode Kontrasepsi Jangka Panjang (MKJP) Pada Pasangan Usia Subur. J Kesehat Masy. 2017.
Yeni F. Hubungan Paritas dan Dukungan Suami dengan Pemilihan Alat Kontrasepsi. J Med Keperawat. 2017.
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Kemenkes RI; 2023.
Indarti H, Susanto H, Sulistyowati A. Effectiveness of Male Permanent Contraception Family Planning Program. MAP (J Management Public Adm). 2019;4.
Senain H. Efektivitas Program KB Dengan Metode Operasi Pria (MOP)/Vasektomi Di Kabupaten Situbondo. ACTON. 2017.
Apriasih SST, Hapi. Description of Side Effects in Contraceptive Acceptors Using the Male Operative Method (MOP) in Singaparna Sub-district, Tasikmalaya District. J Kesehat Bidkemas. 2016.
Sulistiyanti A, Ifalahma D, Pratiwi T. Hubungan Antara Lama Penggunaan Metode Kontrasepsi Iud Dengan Kejadian Anemia Pada Akseptor Kb Iud. OVUM: J Midwifery. 2023.
Suroso AF. Efektivitas Dan Efek Samping Penggunaan IUD Pasca Plasenta Di RSPAL DR. Ramelan Periode Januari 2019–Desember 2021. Surabaya Biomed J. 2023.
Novianti F, Sari IN. Hubungan Lama Menstruasi Dengan Kadar Hb Pada Akseptor Kb-Iud Di Kelurahan Tanjung Uma Kecamatan Lubuk Baja. Zona Keperawat. 2018.
Norazizah Y, Mulastin M. Description of Characteristics of Women Using Tubectomy Contraception (MOW) at RA Kartini Regional General Hospital Jepara. J Health. 2024.
Anindita RNF. Experiences of Sexual Intercourse in Tubectomy Mothers [undergraduate thesis]. Semarang: Diponegoro University; 2017.
Afdalia A, Manaf N. Hubungan Penggunaan Kontrasepsi Hormonal Dengan Kejadian Kanker Payudara Di Rumah Sakit Grestelina Makassar 2020. J Kesehat. 2020.
Norfitri R. Pengaruh Efek Samping Kontrasepsi Suntik Tiga Bulan (Penurunan Libido) Terhadap Kecemasan Ibu Akseptor Suntik Tahun 2022. J Ilmu Kesehat Insan Sehat. 2022.
Rahayu TB, Wijanarko N. Efek samping akseptor KB suntik depo medroksi progesterone acetat (dmpa) setelah 2 tahun pemakaian. J Kesehat Samodra Ilmu. 2017.
Mustikarani IK. Hubungan Lama Penggunaan Alat Kontrasepsi Oral (Pil KB) Dan Intrauterine Device (IUD) Terhadap Resiko Kanker Serviks. J Keperawat Malang. 2020.
Purbawati I. Analisis Kecenderungan Jenis Kontrasepsi Peserta KB Aktif Di Kabupaten/Kota Provinsi Jawa Timur Menggunakan Metode Analisis Korespondensi. J Kesehat. 2015.
Sugijati S, A'ida SHN. Hubungan Lama Pemakaian Kontrasepsi Implan Dengan Kejadian Keputihan. Innovative: J Soc Sci. 2024.
Harmiyah VKD, Megawati RK, Hapisah NR. Hubungan Antara Lama Pemakaian Kontrasepsi Implant Dengan Perubahan Kenaikkan Berat Badan Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas. Integr Perspect. 2025.
Yang F, Li J, Dong L, Tan K, Huang X, Zhang P, et al. Review of vasectomy complications and safety concerns. World J Mens Health. 2021;39(3):406-18. doi:10.5534/wjmh.200073.
Engl T, Hallmen S, Beecken WD, Rubenwolf P, Gerharz EW, Vallo S. Impact of vasectomy on the sexual satisfaction of couples: Experience from a specialized clinic. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70(3):275-9. doi:10.5173/ceju.2017.1294.
Curtis KM, Nguyen AT, Tepper NK, Zapata LB, Snyder EM, Hatfield-Timajchy K, et al. U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2024;73(3):1-77. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1.
Costello C, Hillis SD, Marchbanks PA, Jamieson DJ, Peterson HB. The effect of interval tubal sterilization on sexual interest and pleasure. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(3):511-7. doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02179-5.
Bahamondes L, Bahamondes MV, Shulman LP. Non-contraceptive benefits of hormonal and intrauterine reversible contraceptive methods. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(5):640-51. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmv023.
Godfrey EM, Folger SG, Jeng G, Jamieson DJ, Curtis KM. Treatment of bleeding irregularities in women with copper-containing IUDs: A systematic review. Contraception. 2013;87(5):549-66. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.09.006.
McNicholas C, Maddipati R, Zhao Q, Swor E, Peipert JF. Use of the etonogestrel implant and levonorgestrel intrauterine device beyond the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved duration. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(4):608-13. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001916.
Curtis KM, Tepper NK, Jatlaoui TC, Berry-Bibee E, Horton LG, Zapata LB, et al. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016;65(3):1-103. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr6503a1.
Lopez LM, Ramesh S, Chen M, Edelman A, Otterness C, Trussell J, et al. Progestin-only contraceptives: Effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD008815. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008815.pub4.
Iversen L, Sivasubramaniam S, Lee AJ, Fielding S, Hannaford PC. Lifetime cancer risk and combined oral contraceptives: The Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraception Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):140.e1-140.e10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.002.
Duane M, Contreras A, Jensen ET, White A. The performance of fertility awareness-based method apps marketed to avoid pregnancy. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(4):508-11. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.160022.
